Proof

Evidence, not marketing.

Every file walkthrough below is a real structural pattern from NanoForce engagements, anonymized to protect client and carrier relationships. Where a number isn't yet confirmed for publication, it's labeled as a placeholder — not filled in with something invented to look impressive.

What NanoForce actually tracks — confirmed.

These are operating commitments, not marketing stats.

215+
Carriers profiled — documentation requirements and reduction patterns we've built from real claim files
100%
Of files audited on every engagement — every file, every time, not a sample
2hr
Standard response window on client and carrier-response communication, in writing

Average recovery figures will be published once we have enough closed engagements to report a range honestly, rather than an estimate that sounds good. Results vary by carrier, state, and file type — NanoForce does not guarantee any specific recovery amount.

File walkthrough — Claims-to-Cash, commercial water loss

Illustrative composite, structured from real Pass 1 / Pass 2 audit patterns.

Before

Equipment lines left on Xactimate's default "No Monitoring" notation. No documented dry standard in the estimate header. Demolition scope billed with no signed stabilization addendum on file — leaving the file exposed to both an equipment-day reduction and a spoliation defense from the carrier.

After

Every equipment line corrected with a psychrometric citation. Dry standard established from a documented control sample and written into the scope note. Addendum gap closed before submission. The file went out with nothing left for the carrier to use as a reduction trigger.

ResultSUBMITTED CLEAN
$41,206$58,940
No dispute cycle required — the correction happened before submission, not after a denial.

File walkthrough — Reconciliation, multi-location vendor billing

Illustrative composite, structured from real reconciliation exception patterns.

Before

A parts distributor invoice was entered against two separate job numbers at two locations, three weeks apart. QuickBooks synced cleanly. Neither location's estimator had visibility into what the other billed.

After

Daily reconciliation flagged the duplicate before the second invoice was paid. A credit was issued and the process gap — vendor invoices not cross-checked across locations — was tagged and closed at the source.

ResultCREDITED
$6,180 duplicate$0 owed
Caught before payment, not clawed back after.

File walkthrough — PM Vault, commercial maintenance agreement

Illustrative composite, structured from real renewal-risk patterns.

Before

A 12-month commercial agreement passed its scheduled visit window with no completed visit logged and no renewal outreach sent. The account sat quietly at risk for 38 days before anyone noticed.

After

PM Vault flagged the missed visit inside the exception list, dispatch scheduled a recovery visit within the week, and renewal outreach went out ahead of the actual expiration date — with a documented visit history to show for it.

ResultRENEWED
At riskRetained
Annual contract value retained.
How we handle early-stage proof

We'd rather show you one real file than tell you a number we can't back up.

As NanoForce closes engagements, this page will carry named client outcomes, aggregate recovery data, and dashboard-level proof of the reconciliation and renewal work — each one confirmed before it's published, never estimated for effect.

Until then, the fastest way to see what this looks like against your own business is the same offer as everywhere else on this site: bring a real file, and we'll audit it in front of you.

Want to see this against your own file?