Evidence, not marketing.
Two walkthroughs below are real client files, anonymized. The rest are illustrative composites built from real NanoForce engagement patterns, and they're labeled that way.
The ones that aren't illustrative.
Two real client files, anonymized. No client, carrier, address, or claim number. Exact figures, not rounded.
What this diagram shows The pre-submission audit of the real client file above: $41,206 original estimate, three documentation gaps, $58,940 submitted, +$17,734 of scope documented before carrier review. That is submitted scope, not a confirmed carrier payment. The carrier's payment outcome on this file is not reported.
What NanoForce actually tracks. Confirmed.
These are operating commitments, not marketing stats.
Average recovery figures will be published once we have enough closed engagements to report a range honestly, rather than an estimate that sounds good. Results vary by carrier, state, and file type. Payment and recovery outcomes are not assured.
File walkthrough · Claims-to-Cash, commercial water loss
Illustrative composite, structured from real Pass 1 / Pass 2 audit patterns.
Dehumidifier equipment billed at extra-large class on five rooms with no room-volume math on file. Antimicrobial application billed room by room with no cross-reference to the documented affected zone. Leaving the file exposed to an equipment-class reduction and a blanket antimicrobial cut.
Every dehumidifier line run through an equipment-sizing check, room volume against billed equipment class, before the carrier ever asks. Every antimicrobial charge cross-referenced against the documented affected-zone list. The file went out with the math already done.
File walkthrough · Reconciliation, multi-location vendor billing
Illustrative composite, structured from real reconciliation exception patterns.
A parts distributor invoice was entered against two separate job numbers at two locations, three weeks apart. QuickBooks synced cleanly. Neither location's estimator had visibility into what the other billed.
Daily reconciliation flagged the duplicate before the second invoice was paid. A credit was issued and the process gap, vendor invoices not cross-checked across locations, was tagged and closed at the source.
Third-party
Published in C&R Magazine · The Pre-Submission Claim File: Seven Gaps That Turn Completed Restoration Work Into Unpaid Revenue · Read the article
We'd rather show you real files than tell you a number we can't back up.
As NanoForce closes more engagements, this page will carry additional named client outcomes, aggregate recovery data, and dashboard-level proof of the reconciliation work. Each one confirmed before it's published, never estimated for effect.
Until then, the fastest way to see what this looks like against your own business is the same offer as everywhere else on this site: book a consult, bring one file if you have it, and we'll tell you whether a gap is likely. Full audits happen in the service or the paid File Readiness Audit.
Questions about this proof.
Is this proof real, or marketing?
Two walkthroughs on this page are real client files: the original figure, the gaps NanoForce's audit raised, and the corrected figure. Client, carrier, address, and claim number are removed. The numbers are not. The other two walkthroughs are illustrative composites built from real audit patterns, and each one is labeled that way.
How do I know these numbers are accurate?
Each real file shows the before and after figures exactly as documented, and states what they are: scope documented before submission, not a carrier payment. Composites are labeled where they appear. Nothing here is a projection of typical results.
Can I see my own files reviewed this way?
Yes, in two ways. A Margin Leakage Consult looks at one file or file example and tells you whether a gap is likely. A full Submit, Hold, or Fix review happens in the recurring service or the paid File Readiness Audit.
Send a short inquiry. Tell us what looks off.
Mark reads these personally. No sequence, no sales follow-up you didn't ask for. This form is an inquiry, not a file submission. If a file would help, transfer instructions will follow after we establish the engagement requirements. Please do not send files, policyholder names, addresses or claim numbers through it.